<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blaming the Editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html</link>
	<description>Chronicling the Decline of Newspapers and the Rebirth of Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:06:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gillin</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6756</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gillin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6756</guid>
		<description>Well said. &quot;Good enough&quot; usually beats great if the technology is affordable enough. The glut of information has created a glut of advertising inventory, which is forcing down prices and disrupting the business model. This isn&#039;t TV challenging radio, it&#039;s the printed word challenging the Catholic Church. The impact on societal power structures will be profound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. &#8220;Good enough&#8221; usually beats great if the technology is affordable enough. The glut of information has created a glut of advertising inventory, which is forcing down prices and disrupting the business model. This isn&#8217;t TV challenging radio, it&#8217;s the printed word challenging the Catholic Church. The impact on societal power structures will be profound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msbpodcast</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>msbpodcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>&quot;Radio didn’t go away when tv came along–it morphed into something more precious, and found its niche, especially in automobiles.&quot; -Joseph

The production model of broadcast was stretched by the introduction of television, but not into places where it didn&#039;t belong. You &quot;cant&quot; watch TV and drive.

The business model of producer/consumer was not put at risk through the introduction of the already defunct VCR, DVDs, CDs and their players.

But the introduction of the CD recorder and the DVD recorder started to enable media shifting,

The arrival of broadband has put on life support all of the other media which relied on the producer/consumer economic models.

The disintermediation of intellectual property from its expression in some form of protectable product is half of he problem facing traditional media.

The possibility of maintaining a conversation with anyone, any group, over the entire planet for essentially nothing, the rise of so-called social media, is the other problem facing the traditional media.

That feature is the one that is effectively &quot;pulling the plug&quot; on Gran&#039;ma Media.

And, while they try to sue their own consumers into submission, to conquer he first problem, they have nothing to say about the second, because there is nothing they CAN say.

Marx would be so proud. 

The means of production are now affordable enough to be owned and controlled by the workers.

And it all happened because a whole bunch of people saw a buck to be made selling prosumer toys to all those people.

At some point, the production quality became &quot;good enough&quot; and all of that babble broke out of the tower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Radio didn’t go away when tv came along–it morphed into something more precious, and found its niche, especially in automobiles.&#8221; -Joseph</p>
<p>The production model of broadcast was stretched by the introduction of television, but not into places where it didn&#8217;t belong. You &#8220;cant&#8221; watch TV and drive.</p>
<p>The business model of producer/consumer was not put at risk through the introduction of the already defunct VCR, DVDs, CDs and their players.</p>
<p>But the introduction of the CD recorder and the DVD recorder started to enable media shifting,</p>
<p>The arrival of broadband has put on life support all of the other media which relied on the producer/consumer economic models.</p>
<p>The disintermediation of intellectual property from its expression in some form of protectable product is half of he problem facing traditional media.</p>
<p>The possibility of maintaining a conversation with anyone, any group, over the entire planet for essentially nothing, the rise of so-called social media, is the other problem facing the traditional media.</p>
<p>That feature is the one that is effectively &#8220;pulling the plug&#8221; on Gran&#8217;ma Media.</p>
<p>And, while they try to sue their own consumers into submission, to conquer he first problem, they have nothing to say about the second, because there is nothing they CAN say.</p>
<p>Marx would be so proud. </p>
<p>The means of production are now affordable enough to be owned and controlled by the workers.</p>
<p>And it all happened because a whole bunch of people saw a buck to be made selling prosumer toys to all those people.</p>
<p>At some point, the production quality became &#8220;good enough&#8221; and all of that babble broke out of the tower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6720</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6720</guid>
		<description>The problem with all these local papers is that they serve these small c0mmunities (less than 50,000) and really, their purpose is to highlight the positives of that community.  I am frequently disgusted with my small local paper because it never critically analyzes or criticizes local businesses, institutions or issues.  It is published twice a week and frequently misses stories, and fails to follow up on stories about 50% of the time.  

But it exists to cover local kids in their sporting and educational endeavors, births, deaths, marriages, local clubs (gardening, book club, etc), and local history, etc.  These small papers are going to have to go local to survive.  They are doing a very bad job at covering national issues, and are frequently blatantly partisan.  If they didn&#039;t do that, then the local advertisers would not pay for them, and they certainly cannot get more money out of subscribers.  Most newspapers in the country serve communities that are too small to really support critical investigative journalism because they also depend too much on the advertising moneys of the very businesses and institutions they should investigate.  And don&#039;t get me started on local government....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with all these local papers is that they serve these small c0mmunities (less than 50,000) and really, their purpose is to highlight the positives of that community.  I am frequently disgusted with my small local paper because it never critically analyzes or criticizes local businesses, institutions or issues.  It is published twice a week and frequently misses stories, and fails to follow up on stories about 50% of the time.  </p>
<p>But it exists to cover local kids in their sporting and educational endeavors, births, deaths, marriages, local clubs (gardening, book club, etc), and local history, etc.  These small papers are going to have to go local to survive.  They are doing a very bad job at covering national issues, and are frequently blatantly partisan.  If they didn&#8217;t do that, then the local advertisers would not pay for them, and they certainly cannot get more money out of subscribers.  Most newspapers in the country serve communities that are too small to really support critical investigative journalism because they also depend too much on the advertising moneys of the very businesses and institutions they should investigate.  And don&#8217;t get me started on local government&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medial Digital &#8211; Medien, digitale Medien, Medienwandel, Journalismus, Internet, soziales Internet, Social Web, Web 2.0&#187; Linktipps Neu &#187; Linktipps zum Wochenstart (22)</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6701</link>
		<dc:creator>Medial Digital &#8211; Medien, digitale Medien, Medienwandel, Journalismus, Internet, soziales Internet, Social Web, Web 2.0&#187; Linktipps Neu &#187; Linktipps zum Wochenstart (22)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6701</guid>
		<description>[...] Blaming the Editors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blaming the Editors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6698</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6698</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s right to point blame at editors and lackluster scribes.  The decline of newspapers is especially evident on so many op-ed pages, typically populated these days by former newsroom editors who survived the cut but who are not very well acquainted with the princely, prima-donna, historic legacy of good op-ed writing.  These eds are not used to handling the kind of temperaments best suited for the page; they bristle when they are told something they don&#039;t want to hear.  The result is good contributors going elsewhere and the paper left printing a bunch of opinions by politicians--whom their newsrooms already give enough publicity--and professors, who tend towards the soporific when expressing themselves.

Blaming the Internet---the Internet just reinforced the lazy ethos, as scribes in the newsroom started to cull blogs rather than stay in people&#039;s faces.  But the best blogs are the ones that actually make phone calls and appointments--just like the best scribes---and offer insight when they aggregate rather than just aggregate alone.

Radio didn&#039;t go away when tv came along--it morphed into something more precious, and found its niche, especially in automobiles.  But the newspaper people--it&#039;s like a bunch of people showed up with pea-shooters at the castle, and the people in the castle not only surrendered, they devoted the next decade to intensive pea-shooter research and development themselves.  They went overboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s right to point blame at editors and lackluster scribes.  The decline of newspapers is especially evident on so many op-ed pages, typically populated these days by former newsroom editors who survived the cut but who are not very well acquainted with the princely, prima-donna, historic legacy of good op-ed writing.  These eds are not used to handling the kind of temperaments best suited for the page; they bristle when they are told something they don&#8217;t want to hear.  The result is good contributors going elsewhere and the paper left printing a bunch of opinions by politicians&#8211;whom their newsrooms already give enough publicity&#8211;and professors, who tend towards the soporific when expressing themselves.</p>
<p>Blaming the Internet&#8212;the Internet just reinforced the lazy ethos, as scribes in the newsroom started to cull blogs rather than stay in people&#8217;s faces.  But the best blogs are the ones that actually make phone calls and appointments&#8211;just like the best scribes&#8212;and offer insight when they aggregate rather than just aggregate alone.</p>
<p>Radio didn&#8217;t go away when tv came along&#8211;it morphed into something more precious, and found its niche, especially in automobiles.  But the newspaper people&#8211;it&#8217;s like a bunch of people showed up with pea-shooters at the castle, and the people in the castle not only surrendered, they devoted the next decade to intensive pea-shooter research and development themselves.  They went overboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msbpodcast</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6660</link>
		<dc:creator>msbpodcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6660</guid>
		<description>Thanks  Joe. I enjoyed it. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks  Joe. I enjoyed it. <img src='http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6652</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6652</guid>
		<description>Just throwing it in: on YouTube to find is an old, done around 1940, advertisement
for potential journalists. It tells in about 10 minutes how the newspapers work, what
they do, what the jobs of reporters is like, and so on. It has a certain naivity to it.
Can be recommended to anyone with a sense of humor and bit of curiosity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rvBgaxUXrc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just throwing it in: on YouTube to find is an old, done around 1940, advertisement<br />
for potential journalists. It tells in about 10 minutes how the newspapers work, what<br />
they do, what the jobs of reporters is like, and so on. It has a certain naivity to it.<br />
Can be recommended to anyone with a sense of humor and bit of curiosity<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rvBgaxUXrc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rvBgaxUXrc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msbpodcast</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>msbpodcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m taking a course in media business this fall and the textbook dates from 2002.

I&#039;m going to shut up and let the teacher fantasize on about revenue and expenditure figures.

I&#039;ll be salting the rest of the students with some questions to ask him.

Then I&#039;ll take notes, smile quietly at myself ... and pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m taking a course in media business this fall and the textbook dates from 2002.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to shut up and let the teacher fantasize on about revenue and expenditure figures.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be salting the rest of the students with some questions to ask him.</p>
<p>Then I&#8217;ll take notes, smile quietly at myself &#8230; and pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike wheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6626</link>
		<dc:creator>mike wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6626</guid>
		<description>The London Paper also died today...... but then it was a freebie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The London Paper also died today&#8230;&#8230; but then it was a freebie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike wheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/blaming-the-editors.html/comment-page-1#comment-6625</link>
		<dc:creator>mike wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/?p=2076#comment-6625</guid>
		<description>The London Paper also died today...... but it was a freebie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The London Paper also died today&#8230;&#8230; but it was a freebie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
