<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Journalism, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the Decline of Newspapers and the Rebirth of Journalism</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gillin</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gillin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. Somewhere between 2 and 99 is about right :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. Somewhere between 2 and 99 is about right <img src='http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syd</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Syd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Maybe, but what about reporters covering things like state politics? I still think it's better to have more than one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, but what about reporters covering things like state politics? I still think it&#8217;s better to have more than one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gillin</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gillin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>Most of these big events are covered on TV, so there's minimal chance for error. I guess with 100 reporters at a Presidential press conference that chance falls to near zero. Still seems like overkill to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of these big events are covered on TV, so there&#8217;s minimal chance for error. I guess with 100 reporters at a Presidential press conference that chance falls to near zero. Still seems like overkill to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syd</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Syd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/07/04/the-future-of-journalism-part-ii/#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>I think you're missing the boat about why so many journalists should cover one event. It can be seen as an accountabilty issue. If you have fewer reporters, there's more room for human error, lies, corruption, slanted material, etc.
Look at the big picture. This isn't just about finances; it's about accountability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re missing the boat about why so many journalists should cover one event. It can be seen as an accountabilty issue. If you have fewer reporters, there&#8217;s more room for human error, lies, corruption, slanted material, etc.<br />
Look at the big picture. This isn&#8217;t just about finances; it&#8217;s about accountability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
