<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumerist Defines the New Rules of Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the Decline of Newspapers and the Rebirth of Journalism</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Popken</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Popken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice writeup, Paul. 

Vance,  still at it? Hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice writeup, Paul. </p>
<p>Vance,  still at it? Hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance Decker</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>"Ben Popken doesnâ€™t care what the old rules are" because he's not playing by any rules. I recently found this out when I posted something to the Consumerist and discovered two things:

1. The Consumerists, and Ben, practice the same type of censorship they complain about endlessly.

2. They use the same slimy SEO tactics that they complain about, I finally figured this out after I saw nearly hundreds of 'fake' blogs whose sole intention was to link back to the consumerist.com web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ben Popken doesnâ€™t care what the old rules are&#8221; because he&#8217;s not playing by any rules. I recently found this out when I posted something to the Consumerist and discovered two things:</p>
<p>1. The Consumerists, and Ben, practice the same type of censorship they complain about endlessly.</p>
<p>2. They use the same slimy SEO tactics that they complain about, I finally figured this out after I saw nearly hundreds of &#8216;fake&#8217; blogs whose sole intention was to link back to the consumerist.com web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fools for Rules &#171; Wedia Up</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Fools for Rules &#171; Wedia Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/2008/04/06/consumerist-defines-the-new-rules-of-journalism/#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s hard to follow the rules if you never read the rules. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening over at Consumerist.com with their 26 year old Editor who never worked a day in journalism prior to his current gig. Read all about it over here at the Newspaper Death Watch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s hard to follow the rules if you never read the rules. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening over at Consumerist.com with their 26 year old Editor who never worked a day in journalism prior to his current gig. Read all about it over here at the Newspaper Death Watch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
